Monday, November 11, 2013

Failing To Define Submission


There is a wonderful Bible teacher who is a preacher at a very large church.  He has been pastor there for many years.  I have always loved listening to him.  I am not going to mention his name because I am going to disagree with him on a very critical point of his teaching.

I wanted to see how he taught Ephesians 5:24, "Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing."  His explanation to this was that it did not mean obey your husband.  It meant to have a gentle and quiet spirit.  It meant the husband is suppose to be the provider and protector.  He is to sacrifice for his wife as Christ sacrificed for the church.

This is all biblical but I don't believe this is what submission means.  He clearly was opposed to using the word "obey" in defining submission.  I went to the dictionary and it defined submission as  "the state of being obedient: the act of accepting the authority or control of someone else."  So the dictionary understands the definition of submission but not Bible teachers?

I didn't see that submission meant being gentle, quiet, or expecting the husband to provide, protect and sacrifice in the dictionary.  Yes, husbands should do all that but what if they don't.  Does that mean the wife doesn't have to be submissive?  The problem with this teaching is that wives will decide their husbands aren't loving them as Christ loved the church, therefore, they do not need to submit to their husband.  They will continually look to their husband and see how short he is falling in his God-ordained role and be upset with him.

Being submissive is obeying. Period.  We submit to our government by obeying it.  We submit to our employers by obeying them.  We submit to Christ by obeying Him.  Older women are told to teach younger women to be "obedient to their own husbands" {Titus 2:5}.  Does this mean husbands can physically abuse their wives?  Of course not!

I don't understand why pastors are so afraid to teach what true submission looks like or even mention the word "obey" as if it is a dirty word.  Has your pastor ever taught that wives are to obey their husbands, not just submit but obey?  Even so, I, as an older woman, will continue to teach women to be submissive, yes, even obey their husband in everything.


Comments (45)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Donna McClung's avatar

Donna McClung · 608 weeks ago

I agree with the term "obey". I spoke it in my marriage vows when it was unpopular to do so. I believe that the husband is the head of the household, provider of the flock therein so to speak. I had to work when my kids were growing up. I had to make a lot of decisions back then that my husband didn't or wouldn't step up to. But I kept my faith in our marriage and we worked out things together eventually. It is all about keeping the family together and protected and taking care of the things that matter most; like church and food and clothes and a good loving homelife.
3 replies · active 607 weeks ago
Lori, This is a hard word, and I am still on my knees seeking what the Lord would have me do each day! Blessings!
Everything you talked about is 100 percent correct and everyone dances around it. I was one of those persons when we first got married. I was given a lot of advice on how to manipulate my husband into doing what I wanted so I would be in charge. It lead to constant fighting between us. Sometime later as I read my bible I found eph 5. I did not like what I read. I thought I would become a doormat as everyone had told me. 43 years later we are the happy parents of 12 children. Never once felt like a doormat. And yes I would marry my husband again.
2 replies · active 608 weeks ago
My pastor teaches that women are to obey their husbands, and he just so happens to be my husband:)
As a very new subscriber, I LOVE your blog! I just started to subscribe via RSS a couple of weeks ago and love that you aren't afraid to teach these hard things.

You are spot on with the definition of submission. I really "got" the definition when I read the book "What? Me? Obey Him?" by Elizabeth Rice Hanford. She correlated women obeying their husbands with Christ obeying God. In the Garden of Gethsamene, Christ prayed for the cup to be taken from him but "nevertheless, not my will but thine be done". His job here on Earth was to fulfill God's will for him, to obey God. Yes, Christ was equal to God, but he had to obey. Yes, we are not "less than" our husband anymore than Christ is to God, but we must obey. I read that and my eyes were opened. I don't even think I finished the book because it clicked so much once I understood that correlation. Thanks again Lori! Shannon
1 reply · active 608 weeks ago
Cynthia Swenson's avatar

Cynthia Swenson · 608 weeks ago

This is quite interesting! What I notice from the pulpit lately, is the hesitancy to preach on obeying God! It seems like the word "obey" is very unpopular everywhere! However, I find the Bible consistently teaches that loving God means cheerful obedience to His will. We can foolishly flounder in rebellion & stubborness, but than we are totally miserable, loveless creatures. I believe the grace & "kindness of God lead us to repentance". I love & consistently pray for my pastor. You are right Lori, that submission is obedience, and it is where our joy & reward will be found! Love & prayers, in Jesus, Cynthia
Lori,

We often overlook all those little "thats" is the second chapter of Titus 2, at least I did until I began living Titus 2 so I could teach Titus 2.

Verse 1: Teach sound doctrine
Verse 2: {What would that look or "sound" like?} THAT the aged men...
Verse 3: The aged women LIKEWISE, THAT they BE...
Verse 4: THAT they may teach the young women to BE (a) sober, (b) love their husbands, (c) love their kids,
Verse 5: (d) discreet [If we EVER needed a revival in discretion IT'S TODAY!], (e) chaste, (f) keepers at home, (g) good, (h) obedient to their OWN husbands,

WHY??? THAT THE WORD OF GOD BE NOT BLASPHEMED. Not our pastor's philosophy or interpration of family matters. Not our daddy's reputation. Not even to make our husbands look like the head honcho. "BE this woman," teaches the Titus 2 aged woman, "THAT you won't ever blaspheme the Word of God."

THAT is why you teach what you teach, Lori. WHAT DOES THE W.O.R.D. SAY???

Kelley~
1 reply · active 608 weeks ago
Here's a good interlinear translation of Ephesians 5:
http://biblehub.com/interlinear/ephesians/5.htm

A friend pointed out an additional point to me, about the word "love". In Greek, the word used is agape, and in ancient Greece it referred to the highest, most spiritual form of love between equals. In pre-Christian Greece, the idea that this highest form of love could exist between husband and wife was not accepted by all, as many thought that it could exist only between men. This type of love is also associated with unconditional, sacrificial love - to truly love another as one loves himself.

So, when Ephesians talks about a man loving his wife in the agape-sense, it's a powerful statement. He's loving her as an equal, in a powerful and unconditional way, just as he loves himself. THAT is the context in which the hypotasso (submission) is taking place.
12 replies · active 607 weeks ago
Well said! I particularly like the verse that talks about how our submission and obedience will change our husbands, not our words. It has been true for us in our marriage. It required a LOT of repentance on my behalf.
As to whether this is being said from the pulpit? Certainly not at our last church. The last Preacher did not want to preach on sin for fear of making others uncomfortable. We changed churches. It was hard to find one that did preach it here in Brisbane, Australia. Over here it seems to be an issue of hyper-grace and when you mention it to the Preachers they tell you to not "put yourself under the law". Sigh! I have written often of these issues here if you are interested. No pressure. :) http://heleadsmesharon.blogspot.com/
As I'm sure you know and many of your readers (namely Cynthia above) have mentioned, English is not the original language of the Bible. We tend to get all bent out of shape about the English definition of words. However, the English is extremely reductive when compared to the original Hebrew and Greek. Many of theses Bible teachers (especially pastors) have been to seminary and studied Hebrew and Greek extensively, and they understand it far better than we do. I said all that to say, submission (hupotassó) is not simply about obedience. Are wives instructed to (hupotassó) their own husbands? Absolutely. There's no denying it. However, submission (hupotassó) has a much richer, fuller connotation than oversimplified obedience. Perhaps, that's what the pastor was getting at.

I want to especially thank Cynthia for her eurdite comment and understanding of the subject matter.
I posted 3 comments (1 response, 1 thank you to another poster, and a legitimate question for Lori) that have been deleted. You evidently found them offensive. However, I don't understand why. Considering Matthew 18:15, I would respectfully like to know and understand exactly what you found offensive about my comments. Please email me with Matthew 18:15 in mind and let me know. I will await your response. Thanks.
Cabinetman's avatar

Cabinetman · 607 weeks ago

I was a pastor & studied the Greek & Hebrew & submission means exactly what Lori teaches. And it was taught by pastors like that until the last 50 years. For 2000 years Lori's intrepretation was the intrepretation of the church. I am thankful for a wife that believes as she does.

It never ceases to amaze me the women of the church trying every red herring and devious arguement to get out the command to submit. Yet, these same women believe a man should love his wife as Christ loved the church. In other words they are fine with a man dying, being beaten and abused but try every sly thing they can think of to get out of their half of the deal.

Thank you Lori. My wife has the same struggles talking to women on this. God bless you & Ken. Keep up the good work.
1 reply · active 607 weeks ago
The picture at the beginning of this post that says "Obedience: our gift to God" really bothers me. I am worth so much more than my obedience. Obedience is not what makes me a good person.

I will repeat it: I am worth SO MUCH MORE than my obedience. I am glad I do not think like you.
Anna, your worth has nothing to do with the picture, and you have inaccurately linked the quote about "obedience being a gift" with your worth.

It is true that your worth comes from who God thinks you are in Christ Jesus.. nothing less, and nothing more. We are a Child of God if we have joined into His family by joining Jesus at the cross.

Now that your worth is in Christ, and you are a child of Christ, God asks for your obedience. Your obedience is the only real gift you can give back to him. "We love because He first loved us and gave His Son" and then Jesus says, "If you love me you will keep my commands." John 14:15-31. I John 5 1-2, etc.

God says " Listen! Obedience is better than sacrifice, and submission is better than offering the fat of rams" (I Samuel 15:22).

So in summary... you are correct that a Believer's worth is not defined by our obedience but instead our obedience is defined by who we are in Christ. If we are truly His children we will obey Him and God says our obedience is better than sacrifice. Our obedience is the only gift we have to offer Him. We do not obey just to obey, but we obey out of love, because He first loved us!

Post a new comment

Comments by